In this issue:
|
1. AD HOC PROJECT FACILITATION MECHANISM AND
WORKING GROUP ON WATER AND HEALTH
|
2. INDICATORS AND RELEVANT GUIDELINES FOR
EVALUATION OF THE UNECE STRATEGY FOR EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT
|
3. WHO/EUROPE STARTS ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH
PERFORMANCE REVIEWS (EHPRs)
|
4. NEW PUBLICATION: SCP POLICY REVIEW OF WESTERN
AND SOUTH CAUCASUS EECCA COUNTRIES
|
5. ANNOUNCING THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
|
1. AD HOC PROJECT FACILITATION MECHANISM AND WORKING GROUP ON
WATER AND HEALTH
The first meeting of Ad Hoc Project Facilitation Mechanism (AHPFM)
took place on 25 June 2008 in Geneva , back-to-back with the first meeting
of the Working Group on Water and Health (26-27 June 2008). The AHPFM
meeting was attended by more then 30 participants, including national focal
points to the Protocol on Water and Health, experts from health, environment
and water management authorities, representatives of foreign ministries,
donors, UNDP, WSSCC, WfW partnership, European ECO Forum, NGOs from EECCA
region, and private sector.
The Protocol on Water and Health to the Convention on the Protection and Use
of Transboundary Rivers and International Lakes entered into force on 4
August 2005. At their first meeting (2007), Parties to the Protocol
established an Ad Hoc Project Facilitation Mechanism to help mainstream
international support for national action. The objectives of the mechanism
are to identify priority activities of non-infrastructure intervention for
funding; to assist EECCA and SEE countries and NGOs in drawing up project
proposals and to present such proposals to the Ad Hoc Project Clearing House.
Participants of the AHPFM meeting discussed Draft Criteria for consideration
of project proposals and Draft Guidelines for preparation of project
proposals for the AHPFM. Some amendments included in the text of selection
criteria related to eligibility of NGOs. In particular, UN organizations and
international NGOs were added to para.11 of the Draft. The important
criteria are the Protocol's ratification by the country and submission of
project proposals by its national Focal Point.
The meeting discussed two pilot project proposals on targets setting
presented by Moldova and Ukraine . Norway and Israel expressed their
readiness to support the Ukrainian pilot. Switzerland considered funding
Moldova 's pilot project. In September, governmental delegations from Norway
and Switzerland will visit Ukraine and Moldova to discuss these proposals in
detail. Georgia , Kazakhstan , Kyrgyzstan , Azerbaijan and Armenia expressed
their interest to develop pilot project proposals. The meeting agreed that
Parties to the Protocol and pilot proposals related to targets setting will
have a priority for financial support via AHPFM.
The AHPFM meeting was followed by the first meeting of the Working Group on
Water and Health. Participants addressed p rogress in the ratification
process . 21 countries ratified the Protocol on Water and Health ( Albania,
Azerbaijan, Belgium, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, France,
Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Norway, the Republic of
Moldova, Portugal, Romania, the Russian Federation, Slovakia, Switzerland
and Ukraine ) . Representatives from Italy, Israel, Armenia, Georgia
informed the meeting about the forthcoming ratification or progress towards
ratification .
Parties and Signatories exchange d experiences and provide d information on
the progress made in establishing national and/or local surveillance,
early-warning and response systems, as well as difficulties encountered in
complying with the ir obligations under A rticle 8 of the Protocol. The
Working Group review ed the progress of the Task Force on Surveillance in
conducting a ssessment of the current capacity for water-related disease
surveillance and preparing the guidance documents on water-related disease
surveillance systems.
During the discussion of AHPFM meeting outcomes , the European ECO Forum
raised concern that NGOs working locally in EECCA region and contributing
directly to improvement of the access to safe water would have no chance to
receive support from AHPFM in countries-Signatories to the Protocol. Also,
NGOs from the EECCA countries which are Parties to the Protocol will need to
wait until their country sets up targets. In addition, political instability
in EECCA countries, lack of power of focal points and frequent staff changes
create barriers for NGOs to access this funding. European ECO Forum stressed
that these circumstances would delay participation of main stakeholders and
real progress in implementation of the Protocol.
During the meeting, there was a request from the J oint S ecretariat to ask
European ECO Forum to develop information materials for raising broad public
awareness on the Protocol in EECCA region. The European ECO Forum expressed
its readiness to work on the text.
The documents of the meetings are available at
http://www.unece.org/env/water/meetings/documents_AHPFM.htm
http://www.unece.org/env/water/meetings/documents_WGWH.htm
For more information please contact:
Anna Tsvietkova
Coordinator, European ECO Forum Water Issue Group
E-mail: atsvet@mama-86.org.ua
2. INDICATORS AND RELEVANT GUIDELINES FOR EVALUATION OF THE
UNECE STRATEGY FOR EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
In the UNECE region, a Strategy for Education for
Sustainable Development (ESD) was developed on request of the Fifth
Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” in Kiev . In 2005 this
Strategy was adopted at a High-level meeting in Vilnius , together with a
framework for implementation and explanatory notes (see http://www.unece.org/env/esd/Strategy&Framework.htm
). The UNECE Strategy for ESD is a regional answer to the Decade for ESD
(2005-2015) announced by the UN General Assembly in 2002.
For the success of the ESD strategy, an efficient evaluation tool is very
important. It should illustrate the complex nature of the progress in ESD
and measure the effectiveness of implementation of the Strategy. Such
evaluation procedure has been developed and already tested in a pilot phase;
it will be fully applied in further stages of the ESD implementation process.
It includes comprehensive review of the Strategy's implementation, for which
the UNECE Steering Committee on ESD has set up a region-wide reporting
procedure. Progress in implementing ESD should be assessed in three
implementation phases of the Strategy (Phase I ended in 2007, Phase II
ending in 2010 and Phase III in 2015). Data as of 1 January 2006 are used as
baseline data; thus, the differences in starting points for different
countries with respect to the implementation of the Strategy will be taken
into account.
Reporting mechanisms are quite complicated due to the complexity of the
issue that should be described (ESD and its evolvement). Moreover, they
should not contradict to the basic aim of the Strategy which is to promote,
not “to compare” individual countries of the region.
ESD is a rather new field of education, and its assessment is also a very
new area of exploration. To create a system for ESD evaluation was a task
for an international group of experts which started to work in 2006, and
continues its cooperation (see UNECE Expert Group on Indicators http://www.unece.org/env/esd/SC.EGI.htm).
The most important outcome of this work is the set of indicators that should
“measure the effectiveness of the implementation of the Strategy”. Also, an
informal guidance which includes various recommendations and remarks to
explain instructions for reporting has been produced. Together with UNESCO,
this group collected examples of good practices (see Good Practices in ESD
at http://www.unece.org/env/esd/GoodPractices/index.html). All these
documents were prepared for the first evaluation report ahead of the Sixth
Ministerial Conference “Environment for Europe” ( Belgrade , 10-12 October
2007) and were used to assess the progress made in Phase I of the
implementation of the UNECE Strategy for ESD.
The current set of indicators reflects the situation in the field of
educational assessment: it is the best available evaluation mechanism that
is in accordance with the UNECE Strategy itself, with the availability of
data and methodology, and is applicable under conditions of different
understanding within countries, educational systems, cultures and languages.
The first reporting exercise that took place at the end of 2006 – beginning
of 2007 ahead of the Belgrade Ministerial Conference was not obligatory;
however 36 reports were submitted. Their evaluation proved that reporting
was a useful tool for Governments. An important feedback was received from
countries on the indicators' workability and feasibility.
In response, a few indicators were revised by presenting them in a more
explicit way with a few additional specifications. Also, given the complex
nature of ESD and the differences in the interpretation of indicators in the
different national contexts across the UNECE region, some additional tools,
closely interconnected with each other, had to be developed. The most
important ones are so-called descriptors that provide explanatory notes.
Descriptors will facilitate the interpretation of the indicators/sub-indicators
and will serve as a user-friendly tool for support and enhancement of
reporting done by the Governments. Also, the Expert Group identified the
need for explicit quality criteria for the successful implementation of ESD.
Such criteria/thresholds are intended to provide countries with an
understanding of an expected minimum level of achievement in each stage of
the Strategy implementation.
During its last meeting in July 2008, the Expert Group on Indicators started
to compile indicators, descriptors, criteria, good practices and other
information/recommendation into a comprehensive “Guidance for Reporting”.
This guidance should assist in the process of further evaluation of ESD
efforts in individual ECE countries and in the region as a whole. It gives
an oversight of the set of indicators, explains basic terms and methodology
and provides inspiration by examples and good practices. The Guidance for
Reporting will be finalized during the seventh meeting of the UN ECE Expert
Group on Indicators on 15-18 September 2008. As the final outcome of this
work, a handbook for ESD evaluation in the UNECE region is being envisaged.
For more information and relevant documents please go to http://www.unece.org/env/esd/SC.EGI.htm
For more information please contact:
Jana Dlouhá
Expert
E-mail: Jana.Dlouha@czp.cuni.cz
3. WHO/EUROPE STARTS ENVIRONMENT AND HEALTH PERFORMANCE
REVIEWS (EHPRs)
The WHO/Europe issued its first environment and health
performance review which examines Slovakia . Environment and health
performance reviews (EHPRs) are country-based interdisciplinary assessments
that WHO/Europe carries out at the request of Member States. EHPRs support
Member States by providing policy advice and evidence-based recommendations
on how to address environmental determinants of health.
EHPRs identify the most important environment and health problems, evaluate
the public health impact of environmental exposures and review the policy
and institutional framework taking into account the institutional set-up,
the policy setting and legal framework, the degree and structural
functioning of intersectoral collaboration, and the available tools for
action. The reviews focus on risk factors that most affect the health of
European children.
EHPRs are planned to be carried out for Belarus , Czech Republic , Estonia ,
Finland , Kyrgyzstan , Lithuania , Malta , Montenegro , Poland , Serbia ,
Spain , and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia .
Six EHPRs are co-funded by the European Commission (EC), Directorate General
for Health and Consumers (DG SANCO) as a contribution to the European
Environment and Health process. Additional EHPRs will be implemented through
bilateral agreements between WHO/Europe and some of its Member States during
2008-2009.
Final EHPRs reports will be collated into an overall report to be presented
at the WHO Fifth Ministerial Conference on Environment and Health in 2009.
For more information and Slovak EHPR see http://www.euro.who.int/envhealth/topics/20080714_1
For more information contact:
Dr. Nathalie Röbbel
Technical Officer, Partnerships and communication
WHO Regional Office for Europe
E-mail:
info@ecehbonn.euro.who.int
4. NEW PUBLICATION: SCP POLICY REVIEW OF WESTERN AND SOUTH
CAUCASUS EECCA COUNTRIES
The publication “SCP Policy Review of Western and South
Caucasus EECCA Countries” was prepared by Ukrainian NGO MAMA-86 based on the
outcomes of the project “Elucidating National and Sub-Regional Progress On
Sustainable Consumption and Production Policy in Western (Belarus, Moldova,
Russia, Ukraine) and South Caucasus (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia) Countries
of the EECCA”.
This Review of SCP policy is based on snap-shot surveys conducted by NGO
experts from seven EECCA countries, coordinated by MAMA-86 and financed by
the British Council in Ukraine and OxfamNovib (the Netherlands ). The
project was initiated by MAMA-86, St James's Research, Eco-Accord and
Georgian Environmental League in the framework of Partners for Environmental
Cooperation in Europe (PECE) partnership early in 2007. The review also
includes conclusions of the discussion during the communication bridge Kiev–Tbilisi–London–Amsterdam–Copenhagen–Geneva,
organized in April 2008 by St James's Research, MAMA-86 and Georgian
Environmental League between NGOs and experts on SCP from EEA, UNEP and
ANPED.
The Review concludes that none of the countries from EECCA region has a
distinct policy targeting SCP issues. The SCP terminology itself is not
known; even SD term is mentioned rarely and, unfortunately, often understood
as steady economy growth. Environmental issues are often forgotten or seen
as an obstacle for it. International obligations on SD and SCP patterns are
not translated into national policy.
The Review stresses that in the surveyed EECCA countries there are no
economical incentives for introduction of SCP patterns for individual and
corporate consumers. In practice, the integration of SCP principles is not
regulated by the states and is exclusively an initiative of individual
consumers and NGOs. At the same time the over-centralized systems of energy
and water supply, district heating and waste collection does not only result
into large losses in the transportation network, but also constraints the
individuals decentralized initiatives.
The Review proves that integration of and harmonization with international
standards in construction and communal services began to promote the
introduction of SCP patterns. However, it mainly concerns urban areas, while
the basic infrastructure in huge rural areas remains underdeveloped.
The publication concludes that environmental priority integration into
economical policy has been and still is being induced permanently by the
external factors, such as the decisions of the “Environment for Europe”
process, UN Conference on Environment and Development (Rio, 1992) and UN
World Summit on Sustainable Development (Johannesburg, 2002), multilateral
and bilateral international co-operation. The participation of EECCA
countries in Marrakech process is slow and inactive and citizens' groups are
not informed. The Review stresses that the experience and knowledge of the
national NGOs are still not used efficiently by international organizations
and national governments.
The publication is available at:
http://mama-86.org.ua/files/scp2008_web.pdf (in English) and
http://mama-86.org.ua/files/scp2008_rus_web.pdf (in Russian).
For more information contact:
E-mail: info@mama-86.org.ua
5. ANNOUNCING THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATION FOR
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
As part of the French presidency of the European Union, the
French National Committee of the United Nations Decade of Education for
Sustainable Development is organising an international conference in
Bordeaux, France, on 27-29 October 2008 to bring together French and
international stakeholders in education, training and information relating
to sustainable development.
In the lead-up to the Decade's mid-term world conference to be held in Bonn,
Germany, in March 2009, the Bordeaux event will review the progress made
during the 2005-2008 period and draw up the strategies to be implemented for
the 2009-2014 period.
The conference will focus on the actions carried out in France and other
European countries. It will also take into account the processes developed
in French-speaking and non French-speaking nations, with a more particular
emphasis on countries in the Euro-Mediterranean area.
For more information about submission of papers and posters see the
conference website http://www.decennie-france.fr/ Closing date for
registration is September 15, 2008.
|